How many MegaPixels can your camera capture?, how fast? And how many millions of colors can you display on your computer screen? What are the ISO settings on your digital camera? What kind of film do you use?
How sharp do the pictures get?... Do you sharpen them? Saturate them?... Or do you just let the corner shop develop your film and live the lie that they do not saturate and adjust your prints?...
How refreshing is it sometimes to just let go, to relax the eye muscles and to let the world turn into a noisy blur. How wonderful can it be at times when we travel on the Autobahn, and yet not at full speed. How great does it feel when we can dim the lights at home, or even light a candle. How good does it feel to not have to eat the entire dinner, drink the entire bottle of soda, not supersize that whoppy meal...
And yet with photographs it seems to be a different story. They better be sharp, they better have the right white balance, and they better be of something that has not been photographed before... why is that?...
What if we just installed a sign somewhere in New York and all of us would just try to take the same bad picture of it... how would that be?...
Or let's try to just find the frames between the frames, the moments before the auto focus kicked in... how about taking pictures with the crappiest resolution and with all the wrong settings, and maybe not even of things that are in any way interesting...
Let's try that... for once...
I guess it has been done a lot already... and me writing this here just makes those who grew up on the David Carson diet put greasy stains on their monitors and laugh themselves sore...
And all because this picture of the drawing I recently sent away is just so horribly off... this might be the right time to get that scanner... should I get a film scanner? Do you think?... which one should I get?... I am flirting with those sexy coolscan ones... but what will I do with my large format slides?...
; )..
5 Comments
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Witold published on March 4, 2004 7:09 PM.
about readers on a local train... was the previous entry in this blog.
scans from that other pocket is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Categories
- 360x360 (103)
- Bavaria (3)
- Birds (7)
- Brooklyn (35)
- Castles (1)
- China (1)
- Death Valley (8)
- Denmark (1)
- Design (3)
- Fish (1)
- Flying (2)
- Germany (4)
- Hinting at Work (6)
- Irrelevant Adventures (1)
- Los Angeles (1)
- Moleskine (1)
- New York (197)
- Newark (1)
- Palmed (10)
- Photography (54)
- Poland (4)
- SAS (1)
- San Francisco (1)
- Star Aliance (2)
- Travels (9)
- art (52)
- diary (7)
- drawing (13)
- filofax pages (10)
- home (7)
- just a story... (7)
- just remembering (19)
- just thinking (216)
- nerdy (1)
- observations and experiments... (40)
- on the computer (1)
- personal (9)
- turtle (2)
- web travels (94)
Monthly Archives
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (3)
- September 2009 (2)
- August 2009 (2)
- May 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (4)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (1)
- September 2008 (4)
- August 2008 (6)
- July 2008 (6)
- June 2008 (2)
- May 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (5)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (6)
- December 2007 (2)
- November 2007 (2)
- October 2007 (7)
- September 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (1)
- June 2007 (5)
- April 2007 (7)
- March 2007 (5)
- February 2007 (4)
- January 2007 (5)
- December 2006 (2)
- November 2006 (1)
- October 2006 (4)
- September 2006 (5)
- August 2006 (6)
- July 2006 (5)
- June 2006 (1)
- May 2006 (5)
- April 2006 (11)
- March 2006 (7)
- February 2006 (4)
- January 2006 (7)
- December 2005 (23)
- November 2005 (8)
- October 2005 (13)
- September 2005 (9)
- August 2005 (3)
- July 2005 (13)
- June 2005 (5)
- May 2005 (11)
- April 2005 (15)
- March 2005 (13)
- February 2005 (11)
- January 2005 (11)
- December 2004 (14)
- November 2004 (11)
- October 2004 (22)
- September 2004 (28)
- August 2004 (23)
- July 2004 (25)
- June 2004 (33)
- May 2004 (27)
- April 2004 (35)
- March 2004 (54)
- February 2004 (43)
- January 2004 (38)
- December 2003 (40)
- November 2003 (50)
- October 2003 (38)
- September 2003 (33)
- August 2003 (81)
- July 2003 (65)
- June 2003 (70)
- May 2003 (56)
- April 2003 (59)
- March 2003 (62)
- February 2003 (51)
- January 2003 (49)
- December 2002 (43)
- November 2002 (68)
- October 2002 (62)
- September 2002 (59)
- August 2002 (73)
- July 2002 (84)
- June 2002 (112)
- May 2002 (133)
- April 2002 (105)
- March 2002 (111)
- February 2002 (56)
- January 2002 (35)
- December 2001 (19)
- May 2001 (1)
- April 2001 (1)
- December 1995 (1)
- May 1995 (1)
- March 1995 (1)
- February 1994 (1)
- June 1993 (1)
- January 1993 (1)
- September 1992 (1)
- August 1991 (1)
- July 1991 (1)
- February 1991 (1)
- December 1981 (1)
- November 1976 (1)
- August 1973 (1)
Pages
- Welcome to our new website!
- About
- Contact
OpenID accepted here
Learn more about OpenID
You'll spend a lot of money if you want a scanner that scans slides well (even more if your slides are larger than standard 35mm). The flatbed scanners which scan slides, at least the ones I'm familiar with, have always done a very poor job. I find that if working with larger format slides and you don't have access to a high end scanner such a drum scanner or 4x5 slide scanner, you can do one of two things: make prints and scan those in with a flatbed, or affix them to a color-calibrated lightbox and shoot them with a digital camera (usually macro mode, no ambient lighting other than the lightbox).
The Nikon Coolscans are indeed very nice. That DigitalICE correction algorithm can save hours cleaning up one scan. I'd go that route if you have a lot of 35mm to do.
hmm.. i was thnking about that 5000 one... ou know... SD5000?... not sure about the name...
i love this drawing... i would love to have it GIGANTIC covering the whole wall on my bedroom...
great stuff :) and love the scans from That Book :)
"how about taking pictures with the crappiest resolution and with all the wrong settings, and maybe not even of things that are in any way interesting…"
As a matter of fact, that would be a pretty accurate description of every pix on my blog.
took your advice, skipped the latest version and came home with this little cute apple...
i finally understood their logo: this is the forbidden fruit. it really is.
it is not the latest version and probalby soon a faster one arrives.
but this ones works... 10 times faster than the one before. and that's all i needed. ( i guess i was just too scared to end up with a slow one...)
anyhow, tx for the tip on the shop. they were indeed great.
nyc was interestingm different than expected, but yet awesome.