"The vapours of the substances contained in this tube are known to cause cancer in the state of California." (Boy, am I lucky to be on that other coast, nothing can happen to me here...)
This reminds me of the one time when I called the 1-800 number that was on the back of a little toothing toy I bought in a pharmacy a few years ago. (It was for a co worker friend, so she would finally stop chewing on my ball point pens, making them look like... no I can't write that here.)
Witold: Hello, I bought this toy here, and it is a very nice toy, it is filled with water and has little animals floating in it. It is cute and soft and most definitely made out of PVC, now I am a little worried if the chemicals that make the toy soft might in some way harm the child if they decide to actually chew on your cute little toy?
Operator: Are you in Canada, Sir?
Witold: Ahem, why are you asking?
Operator: Are you in Canada, Sir?
Witold (looking out the window onto downtown Manhattan): Oh, let's say I am in Canada...
Operator: Sir, please take the toy away from your child immediately.
Witold: Right now?
Operator: Yes, please, Sir, please take away the toy.
Witold: Wow, these are very strong words...
Operator: Sir, please take away the toy.
Witold: Okay, well, what if I am not in Canada... let's say I am in New York.
Operator: Then it's okay.
Witold: Wow
Operator: Yes, the toy is harmless.
Witold: But not to Canadian children?
Operator: Not in Canada Sir.
Witold: Is it a different toy for Canada?
Operator: No Sir, it is the same product.
Witold: So the children in Canada are just more sensitive?
Operator: It is a legal issue, Sir...
...
Maybe Canadians read Something like this, while in the US one would visit a site that is a Phtalates Information Center� (Why is there a � on Information Center?... maybe it is time to call Canada...)
Have I posted this story once before?... or twice?... did I chew on that toy?
eat that paint, just not in California and chew that toy, just not in Canada...
Categories:
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://www.witoldriedel.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1085
1 Comment
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Witold published on February 21, 2004 11:19 PM.
$7,975.85 was the previous entry in this blog.
Time travel and the risks of visiting real time New York. is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Categories
- 360x360 (103)
- Bavaria (3)
- Birds (7)
- Brooklyn (35)
- Castles (1)
- China (1)
- Death Valley (8)
- Denmark (1)
- Design (3)
- Fish (1)
- Flying (2)
- Germany (4)
- Hinting at Work (6)
- Irrelevant Adventures (1)
- Los Angeles (1)
- Moleskine (1)
- New York (197)
- Newark (1)
- Palmed (10)
- Photography (54)
- Poland (4)
- SAS (1)
- San Francisco (1)
- Star Aliance (2)
- Travels (9)
- art (52)
- diary (7)
- drawing (13)
- filofax pages (10)
- home (7)
- just a story... (7)
- just remembering (19)
- just thinking (216)
- nerdy (1)
- observations and experiments... (40)
- on the computer (1)
- personal (9)
- turtle (2)
- web travels (94)
Monthly Archives
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (3)
- September 2009 (2)
- August 2009 (2)
- May 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (4)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (1)
- September 2008 (4)
- August 2008 (6)
- July 2008 (6)
- June 2008 (2)
- May 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (5)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (6)
- December 2007 (2)
- November 2007 (2)
- October 2007 (7)
- September 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (1)
- June 2007 (5)
- April 2007 (7)
- March 2007 (5)
- February 2007 (4)
- January 2007 (5)
- December 2006 (2)
- November 2006 (1)
- October 2006 (4)
- September 2006 (5)
- August 2006 (6)
- July 2006 (5)
- June 2006 (1)
- May 2006 (5)
- April 2006 (11)
- March 2006 (7)
- February 2006 (4)
- January 2006 (7)
- December 2005 (23)
- November 2005 (8)
- October 2005 (13)
- September 2005 (9)
- August 2005 (3)
- July 2005 (13)
- June 2005 (5)
- May 2005 (11)
- April 2005 (15)
- March 2005 (13)
- February 2005 (11)
- January 2005 (11)
- December 2004 (14)
- November 2004 (11)
- October 2004 (22)
- September 2004 (28)
- August 2004 (23)
- July 2004 (25)
- June 2004 (33)
- May 2004 (27)
- April 2004 (35)
- March 2004 (54)
- February 2004 (43)
- January 2004 (38)
- December 2003 (40)
- November 2003 (50)
- October 2003 (38)
- September 2003 (33)
- August 2003 (81)
- July 2003 (65)
- June 2003 (70)
- May 2003 (56)
- April 2003 (59)
- March 2003 (62)
- February 2003 (51)
- January 2003 (49)
- December 2002 (43)
- November 2002 (68)
- October 2002 (62)
- September 2002 (59)
- August 2002 (73)
- July 2002 (84)
- June 2002 (112)
- May 2002 (133)
- April 2002 (105)
- March 2002 (111)
- February 2002 (56)
- January 2002 (35)
- December 2001 (19)
- May 2001 (1)
- April 2001 (1)
- December 1995 (1)
- May 1995 (1)
- March 1995 (1)
- February 1994 (1)
- June 1993 (1)
- January 1993 (1)
- September 1992 (1)
- August 1991 (1)
- July 1991 (1)
- February 1991 (1)
- December 1981 (1)
- November 1976 (1)
- August 1973 (1)
Pages
- Welcome to our new website!
- About
- Contact
OpenID accepted here
Learn more about OpenID
I always come here for the pictures... But somehow tonite, I took the time to read your latest entry. I have to say, the title's pretty good...
Anyway, more than the smooth way you introduce the issue, what I really like is how you let the Internet be an inherant part of your argumentation. "Zee Art of Blogging" I guess ;)
I just wanted to point out the "New Study of CDC Data Undermines Activist" headline on the Phtalates Information Center's index page. The CDC's site sure looks better than the average .gov
Also gotta love their use of the term "activist." I guess they couldn't go as far as calling them "terrorists" yet. It's kinda comforting, in a very depressing kinda way though...