Came across this exciting little website today: The New World Trade Center 2002 :: Proposal for a new beginning. Ideas that used to live and die on napkins now make it to the public, dress up as serious projects, flash and soundtrack and all. Impressive amount of work went into this project. The “new” design somehow, reminds me of a different futuristic building that has been around for 30 years. Does the proposed project remind us in any way of the BMW administrative building in Munich, designed by Karl Schwanzer? Hmm... What can I say. While we’re there, let’s not forget the BMW museum next to the Verwaltungsgebäude. It also could be an inspiration (it is a huge BMW logo when seen from the air. Take a tour of the BMW-Museum. (requires QuickTime VR)
Dis-Information Architecture
3 Comments
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Witold published on June 26, 2002 6:45 PM.
A message to my German readers (in German) was the previous entry in this blog.
HTML error 304 is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Categories
- 360x360 (103)
- Bavaria (3)
- Birds (7)
- Brooklyn (35)
- Castles (1)
- China (1)
- Death Valley (8)
- Denmark (1)
- Design (3)
- Fish (1)
- Flying (2)
- Germany (4)
- Hinting at Work (6)
- Irrelevant Adventures (1)
- Los Angeles (1)
- Moleskine (1)
- New York (197)
- Newark (1)
- Palmed (10)
- Photography (54)
- Poland (4)
- SAS (1)
- San Francisco (1)
- Star Aliance (2)
- Travels (9)
- art (52)
- diary (7)
- drawing (13)
- filofax pages (10)
- home (7)
- just a story... (7)
- just remembering (19)
- just thinking (216)
- nerdy (1)
- observations and experiments... (40)
- on the computer (1)
- personal (9)
- turtle (2)
- web travels (94)
Monthly Archives
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (3)
- September 2009 (2)
- August 2009 (2)
- May 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (4)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (1)
- September 2008 (4)
- August 2008 (6)
- July 2008 (6)
- June 2008 (2)
- May 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (5)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (6)
- December 2007 (2)
- November 2007 (2)
- October 2007 (7)
- September 2007 (1)
- August 2007 (1)
- June 2007 (5)
- April 2007 (7)
- March 2007 (5)
- February 2007 (4)
- January 2007 (5)
- December 2006 (2)
- November 2006 (1)
- October 2006 (4)
- September 2006 (5)
- August 2006 (6)
- July 2006 (5)
- June 2006 (1)
- May 2006 (5)
- April 2006 (11)
- March 2006 (7)
- February 2006 (4)
- January 2006 (7)
- December 2005 (23)
- November 2005 (8)
- October 2005 (13)
- September 2005 (9)
- August 2005 (3)
- July 2005 (13)
- June 2005 (5)
- May 2005 (11)
- April 2005 (15)
- March 2005 (13)
- February 2005 (11)
- January 2005 (11)
- December 2004 (14)
- November 2004 (11)
- October 2004 (22)
- September 2004 (28)
- August 2004 (23)
- July 2004 (25)
- June 2004 (33)
- May 2004 (27)
- April 2004 (35)
- March 2004 (54)
- February 2004 (43)
- January 2004 (38)
- December 2003 (40)
- November 2003 (50)
- October 2003 (38)
- September 2003 (33)
- August 2003 (81)
- July 2003 (65)
- June 2003 (70)
- May 2003 (56)
- April 2003 (59)
- March 2003 (62)
- February 2003 (51)
- January 2003 (49)
- December 2002 (43)
- November 2002 (68)
- October 2002 (62)
- September 2002 (59)
- August 2002 (73)
- July 2002 (84)
- June 2002 (112)
- May 2002 (133)
- April 2002 (105)
- March 2002 (111)
- February 2002 (56)
- January 2002 (35)
- December 2001 (19)
- May 2001 (1)
- April 2001 (1)
- December 1995 (1)
- May 1995 (1)
- March 1995 (1)
- February 1994 (1)
- June 1993 (1)
- January 1993 (1)
- September 1992 (1)
- August 1991 (1)
- July 1991 (1)
- February 1991 (1)
- December 1981 (1)
- November 1976 (1)
- August 1973 (1)
Pages
- Welcome to our new website!
- About
- Contact
OpenID accepted here
Learn more about OpenID
Interestingly high tech... a park would be nice, and so simple.
Wit,
I hate to be the one to say it, but I don't like it. The BMW building by comparison is much better. This appears to be a rip-off of that design, with every other idea these designers could think of crammed in. I love some of the ideas, such as the biosphere and the 2800 trees, etc., but the thing looks like a frankenstein building. They shoved a pyramid on top! I am surprised that they didn't propose to move Yankee stadium up there. I think they can pare down the design a bit, remove the opera house and residential areas, keep a biosphere or two, and maybe get rid of the full-body scanning machine that helps to make this building an "impenetrable fortress." By the way, there is no such thing as a building that can't be toppled. I thought we learned that on Sept. 11.
Ahem... I am not crazy about it either. I like the trees. The trees are good.
Also, just the claim of building a fortress has been a guarantee of destruction. It works this way even for more primitive animals like corals, or lobsters. So this whole thing is just a huge wrong idea. ; )